Published
2 min read
By Tom Whitfield

Grocery & CPG

California Enacts First Statewide Non-Ultraprocessed Food Label

California enacted the first statewide non-ultraprocessed food label, requiring large grocers to prominently display certified products once they stock 25 or more, despite industry warnings of conflicting definitions.

California enacts non-ultraprocessed label despite concern from food industry groups
PhotoCalifornia enacts non-ultraprocessed label despite concern from food industry groupsI-5 Design & Manufacture / Openverse

At a glance

  • Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the law on Sept. 28, 2026, creating the first statewide non-ultraprocessed food label in the U.S.
  • Large grocery stores must prominently display labeled items when they carry at least 25 certified products.
  • IFT's Anna Rosales warned manufacturers and consumers "could eventually face different interpretations of what qualifies as an ultra-processed food" if other states adopt their own definitions.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law on Sept. 28 creating the first statewide non-ultraprocessed food label in the U.S. The signing defies objections from food industry groups that warn a patchwork of state-level definitions will confuse manufacturers and shoppers alike.

The voluntary label can appear on products that do not fall under California's definition of ultraprocessed foods, which the state established in 2025. Large grocery stores must prominently display items carrying the state label once they stock at least 25 certified products.

California became the first state to define ultraprocessed foods last September. The definition covers products containing at least one additive, or high amounts of saturated fat, sodium or added sugar.

Lawmakers behind the seal pitched it as a transparent, simple way for consumers to spot healthier options. But as other groups roll out their own non-ultraprocessed labels with different definitions, industry organizations see a growing risk of marketplace confusion.

The Institute of Food Technologists, which represents the food science industry, said a consistent, science-based framework for ultraprocessed foods is needed as more states begin enacting their own policies.

If other states follow California's lead and adopt their own definitions, manufacturers and consumers "could eventually face different interpretations of what qualifies as an ultra-processed food," Anna Rosales, IFT vice president of science and policy, wrote in a blog post.

"How ultra-processed foods are defined could ultimately influence school meals, nutrition assistance programs, product reformulation efforts, front-of-pack labeling initiatives, and future dietary guidance," Rosales added. "Given those potential implications for the food system, definitions should be rooted in sound science, aligned with broader nutrition policy objectives, and flexible enough to evolve as evidence emerges."

The California seal joins a growing list of non-ultraprocessed marks available to food manufacturers positioning products as healthier. Existing options include the Non-UPF Verified Standard from the Non-GMO Project and the Non-UPF Certified seal from the nonprofit Non-UPF Program.

The California approach differs in a key way. While other non-ultraprocessed labels focus at least in part on the degree of processing, California's standard centers on nutritional and ingredient composition. Food scientists and industry experts have noted that focusing only on processing could penalize foods like whole grain bread or yogurt that help consumers meet their nutrient needs.

Newsom framed the label within his broader health agenda. "We should be about healthcare, not sick-care, recognizing that preventing illnesses is far preferable to finding — and affording — treatments," Newsom said in a statement. "It's why California is focused on making whole, healthy foods as accessible as possible, why we're making healthier choices easier."

For CPG marketers and retailers, the stakes extend beyond packaging. The display mandate gives certified products potential shelf-placement advantages in large-format stores, while the outcome of competing state definitions could shape reformulation strategy, front-of-pack claims and eligibility for programs well beyond California's borders.

Original: techtarget.com

Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

Staff writer covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in trade marketing, shopper marketing, trade promotions, category management at Target Marketing.

68 articles

Related articles

September 22, 2026Non-GMO Project's Non-UPF Label Tops 300 Certified Products
October 9, 2026California's SB 54 Source Reduction: 10% Cut Due Jan. 1, 2027
September 29, 2026FDA Nominee: RFK Food Agenda Needs More Resources
September 22, 2026Nestlé, PepsiCo join push to scale paper-based flexible packaging
September 29, 2026Senate Bill Would Make PFAS Ban in Food Packaging Federal Law

« Previous articleNext article »